CO129-138 - Sir MacDonnell - 1869 [6-7] — Page 411

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

408

Chrosecution.

Enclosure

2. The Attorney General in his opinion Codes 2 that demand, based in part on his recent personal knowledge of various minor incidents connected with what had taken place in court considered that possibly the Chief Justice had not intended to condemn the Brown in Costa or had probably altered his opinion since delivery of his judgment. Mr Pauncefate pointed out that in another prosecution for libel, though a private one, he decided that the Brown could not be condemned in contumaciam therefore as all that was needed was a knowledge of what the Chief Justice himself intended, and as the Attorney General thought under the circumstances that it was only fair to the Chief Justice himself to apply to him I caused Enclosure W's reference to be made to him accordingly.

Enclosure W.

3. The Chief Justice's reply is not calculated to facilitate the action of the Government and I confess an attentive perusal of it has not enabled me to understand it. I further regret that its length and the various newspapers and documents which it encloses preclude my transmitting it by this opportunity. The remarks of the Attorney General however to whom I referred it illustrate as I think sufficiently its general tenor and serve to explain the action of this Government which is all that...

Edit History

2026-05-20 06:02:37 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
408 Chrosecution. Enclosure 2. The Attorney General in his opinion Codes 2 that demand, based in part on his recent personal knowledge of various minor incidents connected with what had taken place in court considered that possibly the Chief Justice had not intended to condemn the Brown in Costa or had probably altered his opinion since delivery of his judgment. Mr Pauncefate pointed out that in another prosecution for libel, though a private one, he decided that the Brown could not be condemned in contumaciam therefore as all that was needed was a knowledge of what the Chief Justice himself intended, and as the Attorney General thought under the circumstances that it was only fair to the Chief Justice himself to apply to him I caused Enclosure W's reference to be made to him accordingly. Enclosure W. 3. The Chief Justice's reply is not calculated to facilitate the action of the Government and I confess an attentive perusal of it has not enabled me to understand it. I further regret that its length and the various newspapers and documents which it encloses preclude my transmitting it by this opportunity. The remarks of the Attorney General however to whom I referred it illustrate as I think sufficiently its general tenor and serve to explain the action of this Government which is all that...
Baseline (Original)
408 Chrosecution. Enclosure 2. The Attorney General in his opinion Codes 2 that demand, based in part on of various recent personal knowledge of his minar incidents connected with what had in bourt considered that takten place popibly the chief justice had not intended to condemn the brown in Costo or had probably altered his afinion since delivery of his judgment. Mor Pauncefate painted out that in another prosecution for libel. though a private one. he decided that the browm could not be condemned in casta therefore .. as all that was needed was a Knowledge of what the bhief justice himself intended, and as the, Attorney General 3 thought under the circumstances that it was only fair to the bhief Justice himself to apply to him I caused а Enclosure W's reference to be made to him accordingly. Encloome W. it. 3. The Chief Justice's reply is not calculated to facilitate the action of the Government and I confess an attentive perusal of it has not enabled me to understand it. I further, regret that its length and the the various m newspapers documents which it enclases preclude this and apportimity. my transmitting it by The remantes of the Attorney General however to whom I referred it illustrate as I think sufficiently its general timor and serve to explain the action of this Goverment which is all that
2026-05-20 06:02:37 · Baseline
View content

408

Chrosecution.

Enclosure

2. The Attorney General in his opinion Codes 2

that demand, based in part

on

of various

recent personal knowledge of

his

minar incidents connected with what had

in bourt considered that

takten place popibly the chief justice had not intended to condemn the brown in

Costo or had probably altered his afinion since delivery of his judgment. Mor Pauncefate painted out that in another prosecution for libel. though a private one. he decided that the browm

could not be condemned in casta therefore

..

as all that

was

needed

was a

Knowledge

of what the bhief justice himself intended, and as the, Attorney General

3

thought

under the circumstances that

it was only fair to the bhief Justice himself to apply to him I caused

а

Enclosure W's reference to be made to him accordingly.

Encloome W. it.

3.

The Chief Justice's reply is not calculated to facilitate the action of the Government and I confess an attentive perusal of it has not enabled

me to

understand it. I further, regret that its

length

and the

the various m

newspapers

documents which it enclases preclude

this

and

apportimity.

my transmitting it by The remantes of the Attorney General however to whom I referred it illustrate as I think sufficiently its general timor and serve to explain the action of this Goverment which is all that

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.